Residential SDLT Rules Clarified in Mudan v HMRC Case

August 2, 2025by ghanchi2000

Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) can be a confusing area, especially when dealing with run-down or damaged properties. A recent Court of Appeal ruling in the case Mudan v HMRC ([2025] EWCA Civ 799) brings important clarity to the residential SDLT rules, especially regarding properties in poor condition at the time of purchase.

Background to the Dispute

Mr. and Mrs. Mudan purchased a severely vandalized and dilapidated house. They intended to repair and live in the property as their main home. To fund the purchase, they used a residential mortgage, suggesting it was always intended as a dwelling.

Soon after acquiring the property, they carried out substantial works, including:

  • Electrical rewiring
  • Boiler replacement
  • New windows
  • Basement tanking

Initially, the couple paid SDLT at residential property rates. However, they later amended their return, claiming the home was uninhabitable when bought and should have been taxed under non-residential rates. HMRC disagreed and refused the refund.

Tribunal Decisions and Legal Arguments

The dispute progressed through the legal system:

  • The First Tier Tribunal (FTT) supported HMRC, stating the home was still “suitable for use as a dwelling.”
  • The Upper Tribunal (UT) agreed, noting the house always had residential characteristics, even if it required major repairs.

The Mudans then took their case to the Court of Appeal, arguing that both tribunals misinterpreted Section 116 of the Finance Act 2003, which defines residential property for SDLT purposes.

What the Court of Appeal Said

The Court of Appeal firmly dismissed the appeal and reaffirmed that residential SDLT rules apply even when the property needs substantial work. Key takeaways from the judgment include:

  • Suitability, not current condition, is the key legal test. A property doesn’t lose its residential character just because it’s uninhabitable at a specific moment.
  • SDLT classification should not be based on a “snapshot” view of the property’s condition on the day of completion.
  • A house needing a kitchen or rewiring is still more “residential” than a site under full construction, missing a roof or stairs.
  • The ordinary use of language still counts—a residential building under repair is still a residence.
Practical Insights for Buyers

For anyone buying distressed properties or considering renovation projects, this case serves as a firm reminder: if a home is designed or intended to be lived in, it will likely fall under residential SDLT rules—regardless of its physical condition.

If you’re unsure how this affects your SDLT liability, seeking professional advice can help you avoid disputes and penalties.

Conclusion

The Mudan v HMRC case sets a precedent that residential SDLT rules apply even when a property appears uninhabitable. Courts will look at the intended use and overall character—not just short-term conditions. If your property is a house, expect to pay residential SDLT, regardless of the amount of work required.

Do you have questions about your property tax situation? Let our expert team guide you through SDLT regulations and HMRC requirements.

 

Disclaimer

The information on this Blog is for general purposes only on matters of interest. The Company assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the content of the Blog. Even if the Company takes every precaution to ensure the Blog’s content is current and accurate, errors can occur. Given the changing nature of laws, rules, and regulations, there may be delays, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information on the Blog. The Company is not responsible for errors, omissions, or results from using this information. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the Blog’s contents without prior notice.

In no event shall the Company be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence, or another tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Blog or the contents of the Blog. The Company does not warrant that the Blog is free of viruses or other harmful components.

Please read our disclaimer policy.

Offices
Leeds: 94 Street Lane, LS8 2AL

Batley: 504B Bradford Road, WF17 5JY

Bradford: 22 Muirhead Drive, BD4 0HJ

Birmingham: 9 Sheaf Lane, Coventry Road,B26 3EJ

London: Suite 2462, Unit 3A,34-35 Hatton Garden, EC1N 8DX


OUR LOCATIONSWhere to find us
https://careaccountancy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/img-footer-map.png
GET IN TOUCHCare Accountancy Social Links
CareAccountancyOffices
Leeds: 94 Street Lane, Leeds

Batley: 504B Bradford Road, WF17 5JY

Bradford: 22 Muirhead Drive, Bradford, BD4 0HJ

Birmingham: 9 Sheaf Lane, Coventry Road, Birmingham

London: Suite 2462, Unit 3A,34-35 Hatton Garden,London, EC1N 8DX

OUR LOCATIONSWhere to find us
https://careaccountancy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/img-footer-map.png
GET IN TOUCHCare Accountancy Social Links

 

Copyright by CareAccountancy. All rights reserved.

 

 

Copyright by CareAccountancy. All rights reserved.

 

Scan the code